Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1216

reference
107-tree-1
name
1216
tree-preservation-order

undefined

107-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.012718 50.865501)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.012675 50.865496,-1.012677 50.865504,-1.012683 50.865512,-1.012692 50.865518,-1.012704 50.865522,-1.012717 50.865523,-1.012731 50.865522,-1.012743 50.865518,-1.012752 50.865513,-1.012758 50.865505,-1.012761 50.865497,-1.012759 50.865488,-1.012753 50.865481,-1.012743 50.865475,-1.012732 50.865471,-1.012718 50.865469,-1.012693 50.865474,-1.012684 50.865480,-1.012678 50.865488,-1.012675 50.865496)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL